-
bill c
- 5 stars Rating: 97
196 votes total - _ Montani Semper Liberi
- (679)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
gwinn77 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
449 votes total - Born & Bred Mountaineer
- (2123)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Goldrusher35
- 5 stars Rating: 89
468 votes total - (2136)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
gwinn77 said...
It hasn't really been discussed much here either, but my thoughts are that there won't be much movement, at least out in the open discussions, until after the new conference commissioner is selected. Under the new Fox & ESPN deals, the Big12 teams will make nearly $20 million per team. So any additional teams would have to be a big enough draw that it wouldn't cut into and decrese everyone's piece of the pie.
I haven't seen anything official, but rumors around the blogosphere is that Clemson & FSU are at least willing to listen to the Big12, if not are already having behind the scene discussions. I believe those two teams absolutely move the needle enough to up the TV contracts even more than the $20 mil / per team, which makes the Big12 very attractive, as they are only getting 14-15 in the ACC.
If those two teams sign on, the Big12 can be more selective of who they send invitations to for teams 13-16. Where I could see teams like Louisville & BYU getting involved. Obviously ND, would be a huge fish to land, but I don't see them joining a conference until they are absolutely forced to or be left out in the cold.
Navagator
- 5 stars Rating: 95
284 votes total - Rich M
- (2085)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Goldrusher35
- 5 stars Rating: 89
468 votes total - (2136)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
gwinn77 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
449 votes total - Born & Bred Mountaineer
- (2123)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
gwinn77 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
449 votes total - Born & Bred Mountaineer
- (2123)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MarineMountie ●
- 5 stars Rating: 82
3898 votes total - Twitter: @MarineMounty247
- (17115)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Goldrusher35
- 5 stars Rating: 89
468 votes total - (2136)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
DickinsonWVU ●
- 5 stars Rating: 98
71 votes total - (434)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Coastal Eer ●
- 5 stars Rating: 84
541 votes total - (2358)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Coastal Eer ●
- 5 stars Rating: 84
541 votes total - (2358)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Coastal Eer said...
I think if the conference goes any more West (BYU) it will never fit geographically. Also the ACC needs to be destroyed. 4 Super Conferences are coming and the ACC and big12 are fighting to be the 4th. If the big 12 can get some of the ACC now, the big10, SEC.
Big 10 wants in North East and or big markerts- BC, CUse, Pitt, Rutgers, Marland or GT (4 of those)
SEC wants in NC- Duke and UNC
big12 wants tradition- Clemson, Florida State, Miami, VT- and or big markets of Maryland or GT
The key is getting the right combination of ACC to keep attandence high. ACC has such attandence problems if you get the wrong ones it can literly board your leauge to death and kill it like the current ACC. On paper it looks good but most BC, Pitt, UVA, Cuse, Duke, Wake, Miami etc games have half empty stadiums.
The ACC is right for the taking with a new contract worth only about 60% of the big12 deal
-
Coastal Eer said...
We were supposed to be added with Pitt to the ACC but got voted out for academic reasons in the 11th hour according to a lot of people. Our old administration was very commited to the big east. When Oliver Luck was hired as AD a couple years ago he focused on conference realignment. Whether strengthing or leaving the big east.
He was the main reason TCU invited and accepted the big east, and he was the main reason villanova was blocked as a football member. When Pitt and Cuse announced leaving in 2014 last fall he started working heavily on leaving or helping the big east. He came up with the plan of adding Houston and SMU with UCF but when TCU left for the big12 all hope we lost and we looked for a way out 100%
-
Coastal Eer said...
We were supposed to be added with Pitt to the ACC but got voted out for academic reasons in the 11th hour according to a lot of people. Our old administration was very commited to the big east. When Oliver Luck was hired as AD a couple years ago he focused on conference realignment. Whether strengthing or leaving the big east.
He was the main reason TCU invited and accepted the big east, and he was the main reason villanova was blocked as a football member. When Pitt and Cuse announced leaving in 2014 last fall he started working heavily on leaving or helping the big east. He came up with the plan of adding Houston and SMU with UCF but when TCU left for the big12 all hope we lost and we looked for a way out 100%
-
CelinaHorn said...
Thank you, because it helps me understand what some of the other schools could be faced with when it comes to making decisions. There was a time last year our MOD’s had us moving to the PAC 12 and that did not excite me.
I have another question. Over the last two years we had 4 teams leave and they always blamed Texas because they said we ran the conference. What were your perceptions and concerns as it related to this issue, because I am sure other schools would have the same concerns?
gwinn77 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
449 votes total - Born & Bred Mountaineer
- (2123)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Goldrusher35
- 5 stars Rating: 89
468 votes total - (2136)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
gwinn77 said...
I agreed with that perception, because it was a reality. Bebee was "perceived" to be a puppet for Dodds. Its one of the reasons he is out now & Neinas was brought in to stabilize the situation. Plus Texas had the lopsided revenue sharing on the Tier 1 & 2 rights with the rest of the conference. That just wasn't going to fly if the Big12 wanted to remain together.
Once Texas flirted with going fully Independent, they realized that it wouldn't work with the direction that NCAA football will eventually be going to with the four "super-conferences". Everyone knows that ND is going to have to join a conference once that happens.
Now that the Grant of Rights deal has been signed, with all teams agreeing to 6 years, possibly even being 13 years with the new Fox & ESPN deals, the Big12 is as stable as any conference out there. This is where the real fun begins and we can start to go "big game hunting" for other teams and bring the TV $$ package on par or exceed what the SEC & B1G have.
This post was edited by CelinaHorn on 4/19/2012 at 11:22 AM
-
CelinaHorn said...
It is my understanding the new contract will have a prevision which could actually increase the amount of money received by the current teams if certain teams/markets are added. Also, every year we go to a Clemson home game, therefore I am hoping for Clemson, Florida State and Georgia Tech. We also have friends in Morgantown and we will be there when the Horns make their first trip.
We will see you then and welcome to the Big 12 minus 2.



), Clemson is alot like us, terrific fanbase, not a great tv add but very good for the quality of the conference. If we go 14 after those two then UL IMO would have to be first in line and another good add then prob BYU (assuming Notre Dame is off the table). If the goal is big time tv market (which is why Mizzu is sitting in the SEC now) then who knows, Rutgers may be on the Radar..
good grief gwinn I swear I didnt mean to do that, Ill just go catch up on my sleep now wow...





Realignment