Online Now 288

Country Roads Confidential

On this Board 106
Record: 2770 (9/30/2012)

Online now 238
Record: 5616 (8/2/2011)

Reply

Realignment

  • I did not look at all your topics so if you have already discussed this sorry. We in Texas believe there is more realignment to come. Therefore, what is your position and who would you like to see added?

    CelinaHorn

  • Celina, I also believe realignment is inevetible and nescessary. I think the popular choices are Louisville and Cincinnati, but I would personally rather add Clemson and Florida State first. Although for ultimate conference stability I would like to see 14 or 16.

    bill c

  • It hasn't really been discussed much here either, but my thoughts are that there won't be much movement, at least out in the open discussions, until after the new conference commissioner is selected. Under the new Fox & ESPN deals, the Big12 teams will make nearly $20 million per team. So any additional teams would have to be a big enough draw that it wouldn't cut into and decrese everyone's piece of the pie.

    I haven't seen anything official, but rumors around the blogosphere is that Clemson & FSU are at least willing to listen to the Big12, if not are already having behind the scene discussions. I believe those two teams absolutely move the needle enough to up the TV contracts even more than the $20 mil / per team, which makes the Big12 very attractive, as they are only getting 14-15 in the ACC.

    If those two teams sign on, the Big12 can be more selective of who they send invitations to for teams 13-16. Where I could see teams like Louisville & BYU getting involved. Obviously ND, would be a huge fish to land, but I don't see them joining a conference until they are absolutely forced to or be left out in the cold.

    signature image signature image signature image

    follow me on twitter @gwinnUSAF77

    gwinn77

  • CH, Chris touched on it in the mailbag and I think he is spot on, we prob won't see/hear much until the new commish is in place, after that then any new members will have to bring some serious value to the conference so everyone still gets a large cut in the payouts.

    Personally it can't happen quick enough for me if FSU and Clemson are indeed the top targets, FSU gets the B12 footprint in Florida much like the SEC got theirs in Texas and we get a nice tv market(though a friend of mine said if we are looking for tv market AND program and your raiding the ACC anyway, then why not the U?stir), Clemson is alot like us, terrific fanbase, not a great tv add but very good for the quality of the conference. If we go 14 after those two then UL IMO would have to be first in line and another good add then prob BYU (assuming Notre Dame is off the table). If the goal is big time tv market (which is why Mizzu is sitting in the SEC now) then who knows, Rutgers may be on the Radar..

    If it does go down let's hope it happens during the offseason so we can actually focus on the games this year.

    This post has been edited 3 times, most recently by Goldrusher35 on 4/18/2012 at 6:34 PM

    Goldrusher35

  • gwinn77 said...

    It hasn't really been discussed much here either, but my thoughts are that there won't be much movement, at least out in the open discussions, until after the new conference commissioner is selected. Under the new Fox & ESPN deals, the Big12 teams will make nearly $20 million per team. So any additional teams would have to be a big enough draw that it wouldn't cut into and decrese everyone's piece of the pie.

    I haven't seen anything official, but rumors around the blogosphere is that Clemson & FSU are at least willing to listen to the Big12, if not are already having behind the scene discussions. I believe those two teams absolutely move the needle enough to up the TV contracts even more than the $20 mil / per team, which makes the Big12 very attractive, as they are only getting 14-15 in the ACC.

    If those two teams sign on, the Big12 can be more selective of who they send invitations to for teams 13-16. Where I could see teams like Louisville & BYU getting involved. Obviously ND, would be a huge fish to land, but I don't see them joining a conference until they are absolutely forced to or be left out in the cold.

    I was just thinking reading your post about possible behind the scenes talk with FSU, I have not heard a lot more about the lawsuite from FSU.
    Probably over thinking

    Navagator

  • headslapgood grief gwinn I swear I didnt mean to do that, Ill just go catch up on my sleep now wow...

    Goldrusher35

  • Goldrusher35 said...

    headslapgood grief gwinn I swear I didnt mean to do that, Ill just go catch up on my sleep now wow...

    HAHA, I read your post & was like...hummm did he read what I posted??? Its all good, brother!

    signature image signature image signature image

    follow me on twitter @gwinnUSAF77

    gwinn77

  • Navagator said...

    I was just thinking reading your post about possible behind the scenes talk with FSU, I have not heard a lot more about the lawsuite from FSU. Probably over thinking

    You know, I haven't heard anymore about that either.

    signature image signature image signature image

    follow me on twitter @gwinnUSAF77

    gwinn77

  • It is my understanding the new contract will have a prevision which could actually increase the amount of money received by the current teams if certain teams/markets are added. Also, every year we go to a Clemson home game, therefore I am hoping for Clemson, Florida State and Georgia Tech. We also have friends in Morgantown and we will be there when the Horns make their first trip.

    We will see you then and welcome to the Big 12 minus 2.

    CelinaHorn

  • Big 12 should put the full court pressure on Florida State, Clemson and GT, IMO. Throw the big figures at them, sell the conference as a football first conference and see if they bite.

    signature image signature image signature image

    MarineMountie

  • Id take that in a heartbeat, I like the GT idea too.

    Goldrusher35

  • If FSU & Clemson go, I could see VaTech checking out the B12. The ACC's football cred is barely better than the Big East. Take out FSU & Clemson and they'll give the MAC a run for their money.

    DickinsonWVU

  • MarineMountie said...

    Big 12 should put the full court pressure on Florida State, Clemson and GT, IMO. Throw the big figures at them, sell the conference as a football first conference and see if they bite.

    What were WV reasons for wanting to leave the Big East, and was this something you had been exploring for a long time or did it happen quickly?

    CelinaHorn

  • I think if the conference goes any more West (BYU) it will never fit geographically. Also the ACC needs to be destroyed. 4 Super Conferences are coming and the ACC and big12 are fighting to be the 4th. If the big 12 can get some of the ACC now, the big10, SEC.

    Big 10 wants in North East and or big markerts- BC, CUse, Pitt, Rutgers, Marland or GT (4 of those)

    SEC wants in NC- Duke and UNC

    big12 wants tradition- Clemson, Florida State, Miami, VT- and or big markets of Maryland or GT

    The key is getting the right combination of ACC to keep attandence high. ACC has such attandence problems if you get the wrong ones it can literly board your leauge to death and kill it like the current ACC. On paper it looks good but most BC, Pitt, UVA, Cuse, Duke, Wake, Miami etc games have half empty stadiums.

    The ACC is right for the taking with a new contract worth only about 60% of the big12 deal

    Coastal Eer

  • CelinaHorn said...

    What were WV reasons for wanting to leave the Big East, and was this something you had been exploring for a long time or did it happen quickly?

    We were supposed to be added with Pitt to the ACC but got voted out for academic reasons in the 11th hour according to a lot of people. Our old administration was very commited to the big east. When Oliver Luck was hired as AD a couple years ago he focused on conference realignment. Whether strengthing or leaving the big east.

    He was the main reason TCU invited and accepted the big east, and he was the main reason villanova was blocked as a football member. When Pitt and Cuse announced leaving in 2014 last fall he started working heavily on leaving or helping the big east. He came up with the plan of adding Houston and SMU with UCF but when TCU left for the big12 all hope we lost and we looked for a way out 100%

    Coastal Eer

  • Coastal Eer said...

    I think if the conference goes any more West (BYU) it will never fit geographically. Also the ACC needs to be destroyed. 4 Super Conferences are coming and the ACC and big12 are fighting to be the 4th. If the big 12 can get some of the ACC now, the big10, SEC.

    Big 10 wants in North East and or big markerts- BC, CUse, Pitt, Rutgers, Marland or GT (4 of those)

    SEC wants in NC- Duke and UNC

    big12 wants tradition- Clemson, Florida State, Miami, VT- and or big markets of Maryland or GT

    The key is getting the right combination of ACC to keep attandence high. ACC has such attandence problems if you get the wrong ones it can literly board your leauge to death and kill it like the current ACC. On paper it looks good but most BC, Pitt, UVA, Cuse, Duke, Wake, Miami etc games have half empty stadiums.

    The ACC is right for the taking with a new contract worth only about 60% of the big12 deal

    There are those in our conference that do not want 16 teams, but if we wait the other conferences will go to 16 first and we will be back to playing catch up again. I believe we were fortunate last time to get TCU and WV, because the combination of both are an upgrade from what we lost. Also, the right combination of schools will put us in geographical competition with the ACC, Big 10 and SEC, and in my opinion that would be huge for recruiting and TV.

    CelinaHorn

  • Coastal Eer said...

    We were supposed to be added with Pitt to the ACC but got voted out for academic reasons in the 11th hour according to a lot of people. Our old administration was very commited to the big east. When Oliver Luck was hired as AD a couple years ago he focused on conference realignment. Whether strengthing or leaving the big east.

    He was the main reason TCU invited and accepted the big east, and he was the main reason villanova was blocked as a football member. When Pitt and Cuse announced leaving in 2014 last fall he started working heavily on leaving or helping the big east. He came up with the plan of adding Houston and SMU with UCF but when TCU left for the big12 all hope we lost and we looked for a way out 100%

    Thank you, because it helps me understand what some of the other schools could be faced with when it comes to making decisions. There was a time last year our MOD’s had us moving to the PAC 12 and that did not excite me.

    I have another question. Over the last two years we had 4 teams leave and they always blamed Texas because they said we ran the conference. What were your perceptions and concerns as it related to this issue, because I am sure other schools would have the same concerns?

    CelinaHorn

  • Coastal Eer said...

    We were supposed to be added with Pitt to the ACC but got voted out for academic reasons in the 11th hour according to a lot of people. Our old administration was very commited to the big east. When Oliver Luck was hired as AD a couple years ago he focused on conference realignment. Whether strengthing or leaving the big east.

    He was the main reason TCU invited and accepted the big east, and he was the main reason villanova was blocked as a football member. When Pitt and Cuse announced leaving in 2014 last fall he started working heavily on leaving or helping the big east. He came up with the plan of adding Houston and SMU with UCF but when TCU left for the big12 all hope we lost and we looked for a way out 100%

    This pretty much jives with everything we've heard. Although my personal opinion is that Luck was working both sides the whole time -- trying to strengthen the Big East while also looking for a way out.

    WVU and Pitt were pushing to jump to the ACC last summer, but it was tough to get support for WVU among the ACC snob schools (I think we can all guess which ones were for WVU and which ones were against WVU).

    At some point early in September, something changed and WVU withdrew from the ACC push. Most likely it became clear that WVU would not have the votes to get into the ACC, although some still think it's because WVU had strong indications that they were the SEC's pick for #14. Either way, WVU to the ACC was done and that's when you saw Pitt and Syracuse make the jump.

    What happened in late September and early October is cloudy. It's never been clear whether WVU was definitely the SEC's #2 pick for the 14th spot, but it sure seems that way. It also isn't clear how close Missouri was to actually staying in the Big 12. Either way, when it became clear that Missouri was definitely jumping to the SEC, that's when we saw WVU to the Big 12 heat up.

    WVUfaninDC

  • The funny thing is, even though it only came to pass as a result of several other dominoes falling, WVU and the Big 12 seem like they were made for each other.

    WVU got out of the terrible Big East and helped the Big 12 stabilize, along with TCU. Plus, WVU gives the Big 12 a strong football and basketball school in the eastern part of the country, which means the Big 12 is now positioned to try to expand into the southeast ... right into the heart of the SEC. I'm not saying it will definitely happen, but I am saying that the Big 12 is in a remarkable position of strength considering how shaky things looked just a year ago.

    As a WVU fan, I will admit that the Big 12 was not my first choice last summer. But I am grateful for the Big 12 for getting us out of the Big East and excited about the league as it currently stands. However, the possibility of additional expansion making the league even stronger gets me very excited.

    WVUfaninDC

  • CelinaHorn said...

    Thank you, because it helps me understand what some of the other schools could be faced with when it comes to making decisions. There was a time last year our MOD’s had us moving to the PAC 12 and that did not excite me.

    I have another question. Over the last two years we had 4 teams leave and they always blamed Texas because they said we ran the conference. What were your perceptions and concerns as it related to this issue, because I am sure other schools would have the same concerns?

    I agreed with that perception, because it was a reality. Bebee was "perceived" to be a puppet for Dodds. Its one of the reasons he is out now & Neinas was brought in to stabilize the situation. Plus Texas had the lopsided revenue sharing on the Tier 1 & 2 rights with the rest of the conference. That just wasn't going to fly if the Big12 wanted to remain together.

    Once Texas flirted with going fully Independent, they realized that it wouldn't work with the direction that NCAA football will eventually be going to with the four "super-conferences". Everyone knows that ND is going to have to join a conference once that happens.

    Now that the Grant of Rights deal has been signed, with all teams agreeing to 6 years, possibly even being 13 years with the new Fox & ESPN deals, the Big12 is as stable as any conference out there. This is where the real fun begins and we can start to go "big game hunting" for other teams and bring the TV $$ package on par or exceed what the SEC & B1G have.

    signature image signature image signature image

    follow me on twitter @gwinnUSAF77

    gwinn77

  • I agree DC, the B12 Needs to hit the southeast and hit it hard, the northeast has some good markets and SOME good fanbases, just nowhere near the interest as the southeast part of the country the move southeast IMO strengthens the B12 by a ton and makes the most sense.

    Goldrusher35

  • gwinn77 said...

    I agreed with that perception, because it was a reality. Bebee was "perceived" to be a puppet for Dodds. Its one of the reasons he is out now & Neinas was brought in to stabilize the situation. Plus Texas had the lopsided revenue sharing on the Tier 1 & 2 rights with the rest of the conference. That just wasn't going to fly if the Big12 wanted to remain together.

    Once Texas flirted with going fully Independent, they realized that it wouldn't work with the direction that NCAA football will eventually be going to with the four "super-conferences". Everyone knows that ND is going to have to join a conference once that happens.

    Now that the Grant of Rights deal has been signed, with all teams agreeing to 6 years, possibly even being 13 years with the new Fox & ESPN deals, the Big12 is as stable as any conference out there. This is where the real fun begins and we can start to go "big game hunting" for other teams and bring the TV $$ package on par or exceed what the SEC & B1G have.

    I think with the grant of rights and the hiring of a commissioner that understands how to market a conference with a large footprint, it will be game on. Because, unless the SEC expands beyond 16 teams they must be very selective of whom they add. Because I believe Florida will vote against Florida State, South Carolina will vote against Clemson, Georgia will vote against Georgia Tech and I do not see North Carolina going without Duke. But I was wrong about A&M leaving without Texas.

    I would give the Big 10 the big cities in east, because I do not see them as a culture fit with the mid atlantic, midwest and south and trying to blend cultures will be difficult. And the ACC views themselves as a basketball conference.

    I believe the Big 12 should give ND a deadline and not look back if they don’t join. We provide the opportunity for them to join a conference with a good source of money and they can still have a TV network as an alternate source of money.

    This post was edited by CelinaHorn on 4/19/2012 at 11:22 AM

    CelinaHorn

  • Assuming ND is off the table...

    FSU, Clemson, Miami, Louisville are probably a solid 4, then 2 of NC State/GT/Maryland(don't think GT would leave the ACC). That would build a good base on the Atlantic Coast and give WVU some regional partners.

    signature image signature image signature image

    khorn28

  • CelinaHorn said...

    It is my understanding the new contract will have a prevision which could actually increase the amount of money received by the current teams if certain teams/markets are added. Also, every year we go to a Clemson home game, therefore I am hoping for Clemson, Florida State and Georgia Tech. We also have friends in Morgantown and we will be there when the Horns make their first trip.

    We will see you then and welcome to the Big 12 minus 2.

    You are right. If we bring in quality teams, then the pay out increases. Expansion is inevitable.

    Dbjscott

  • A 14 to 16 game model would be great for Big 12.

    14 teams:

    Florida State
    Miami
    Clemson
    Louisville

    The additions of Florida State and Miami allow the Big 12 to become the premier conference in Florida. The ACC is not a football conference and with the Big 12's football mission, you would see the 2 programs become better. Each school would become more visible nationally.

    Clemson would be a natural fit. Great fanbase, facilites, and good tradition.

    Louisville would make a good addition for basketball and pretty good addition in basketball. It would give Kansas a close to blue blood in basketball.

    Other teams of interest:

    Georgia Tech- Is the Atlanta market worth going after?

    Maryland- Can you snage Maryland from ACC or potential Big 10 invite ( along with Duke, UVA, and UNC) if Big 10 goes to 16.

    Notre Dame- Could ND join a conference and see value in Big 12's ability to allow Irish to have their own network? Would be a coup.

    Rutgers- The NY market. Would it be worth adding an up and coming football program that can't bust out.

    Pitt- Would ND push to add Pitt to Big 12 if it agrees to join?

    UCONN- is the basketball school worth the investment?

    VT- The SEC has their eyes on VT most likely if UVA bolts to Big 10.

    NC State- The SEC would direct it's attention at NC State/RDU to offset UNC and Duke going to Big 10 if that happened.

    BYU- Would add huge fanbase in West.

    Arete